From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ulrich Mueller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:43:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6193374b-a60d-ba82-91b5-afdede18e3bb@yandex.ru> <72871d3a-3b6a-d6fd-01cc-4248f817923c@yandex.ru> <801f93f3-8c1f-5f5f-6351-e1169bc309ae@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6070"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: bugs@gnu.support, Ulrich Mueller , emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 22 10:44:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2szj-0001Rb-Ke for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:44:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56934 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2szi-0002Ma-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 04:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2syv-0001Xq-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 04:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:48314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2syr-0003dB-Eo; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 04:43:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:06:22 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=140.211.166.183; envelope-from=ulm@gentoo.org; helo=smtp.gentoo.org X-Spam_score_int: -68 X-Spam_score: -6.9 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263269 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Richard Stallman wrote: >> In the concrete case, I believe the RNG schemas were taken from the Open >> Document standard. It is somewhat understandable that they don't want to >> allow modified versions of the standard, but that makes these schemas >> non-free. > In the short term, I think we need to delete them, but we can try > asking the committee to liberate the code of those schemas under > other names. > What role do these particular schemas play in the standard? > Are they examples? Are they used by the standards documents? It's not entirely clear to me if they're considered part of the standard. They are referenced in [1] under "Related work", but it also says that "This specification consists of this document as well as the following documents, schemas and ontologies". [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os.html