[markus.triska@gmx.at: emacs.c (main): fix profiling instructions]

[markus.triska@gmx.at: emacs.c (main): fix profiling instructions]

[Richard Stallman]

Is this change correct?

------- Start of forwarded message -------
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 
	autolearn=failed version=3.1.0
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:11:45 +0200
From: Markus Triska <markus.triska@gmx.at>
To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
Subject: emacs.c (main): fix profiling instructions


2007-03-30  Markus Triska  <markus.triska@gmx.at>

	* emacs.c (main): fix profiling instructions


*** emacs.c	21 Jan 2007 05:18:16 +0100	1.399
- --- emacs.c	30 Mar 2007 13:48:25 +0200	
***************
*** 1720,1726 ****
       GNU/Linux and MinGW.  It might work on some other systems too.
       Give it a try and tell us if it works on your system.  To compile
       for profiling use something like:
!        `make CFLAGS="-pg -g -O -DPROFILING=1'.  */
  #if defined (__FreeBSD__) || defined (GNU_LINUX) || defined(__MINGW32__)
  #ifdef PROFILING
    if (initialized)
- --- 1720,1726 ----
       GNU/Linux and MinGW.  It might work on some other systems too.
       Give it a try and tell us if it works on your system.  To compile
       for profiling use something like:
!        `./configure CFLAGS="-pg -g -O -DPROFILING=1" LDFLAGS="-pg"'.  */
  #if defined (__FreeBSD__) || defined (GNU_LINUX) || defined(__MINGW32__)
  #ifdef PROFILING
    if (initialized)



_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
------- End of forwarded message -------

Re: [markus.triska@gmx.at: emacs.c (main): fix profiling instructions]

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:22:21 -0400
> 
> Is this change correct?

It is correct, but it might not be optimal.  I asked Markus whether
adding LDFLAGS to the Make command line would be equally good, let's
hear what he says in response.