From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Takashi Hiromatsu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest 22.1.91 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:16:18 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87ejb8vl0i.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <47C17D74.9050204@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.14.1 - "Choanoflagellata") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203902244 24755 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2008 01:17:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:17:24 +0000 (UTC) To: Jason Rumney , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 02:17:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTRyW-0004W5-Jo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:17:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTRy0-0002NQ-S5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:17:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTRxy-0002N9-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTRxw-0002Mp-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:17:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTRxw-0002Ml-G7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:17:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mx54.ms.so-net.ne.jp ([202.238.83.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JTRxn-0001Y6-U6; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:17:04 -0500 Original-Received: from matsuan.so-net.ne.jp (nproxy.vdn.pwd.ne.jp [210.249.184.60]) (authenticated) by mx54.ms.so-net.ne.jp with ESMTP id m1P1Gtf9025912; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:16:56 +0900 Original-Received: by matsuan.so-net.ne.jp (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:16:25 +0900 In-Reply-To: <47C17D74.9050204@gnu.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) EMIKO/1.14.1 (Choanoflagellata) LIMIT/1.14.10 (Furuichi) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.1.91 (i386-mingw-nt5.0.2195) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90325 Archived-At: Thank you for your information. At Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:21:40 +0000, Jason Rumney wrote: > > Takashi Hiromatsu wrote: > > 1. Why the Xpm library order in 'image-library-alist was changed? > > > Because the one we are shipping with Emacs is called libxpm.dll. I ran > into the same problem you are seeing when Gimp was in the path, because > its xpm4.dll was incompatible with Emacs. Could you teach me, what are the advances from or differences between libxpm.dll from "xpm4.dll" or "libXpm-nox4.dll" ? Now, we can get xpm4.dll easily from gnuwin32 homepage.(few years ago, libXpm-nox4) > > 2. Where libxpm.dll can be found? > > > http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/pretest/windows/ > > (the DLL is bundled with the Emacs binaries, source is in > libXpm-3.5.7-w32-src.zip) Thank you, I tried the DLL bundled with abovebinaries, then it works fine. In my opinion, If your libxpm.dll has much advances than others, it should be placed at first in the alist. And it is better that the DLL can be take alone, not with huge package. If not, more popular one should be placed at first. How do you think, Eli and Jason? Takashi Hiromatsu