From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utf-8 cjk translation bug? Date: 06 Oct 2003 21:53:45 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200309301259.VAA01304@etlken.m17n.org> <200310020108.KAA03803@etlken.m17n.org> <3F7DA52B.2060208@gnu.org> <87u16mf867.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065474307 8793 80.91.224.253 (6 Oct 2003 21:05:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 06 23:05:04 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6cXQ-0000YN-00 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 23:05:04 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6cXQ-0002UJ-00 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 23:05:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A6cQd-0002Ze-8l for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1A6cO4-0000Wd-4y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:55:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1A6cNX-0000HZ-GO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.56.14] (helo=server0027.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1A6cN0-00005P-EQ; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:54:18 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonr.f2s.com ([195.137.103.251]) by server0027.freedom2surf.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) with ESMTP id h96KsGXt000748; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 20:54:16 GMT Original-Received: from NYAUMO (nyaumo.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.27]) by wanchan.jasonr.f2s.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FB2DDD5A; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:53:05 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: <87u16mf867.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16965 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16965 Miles Bader writes: > Miles Bader writes: > > Yeah, that's definitely the case, and it's not just a problem with > > double-width characters -- the coverage of many iso10646 fonts seems > > completely crap. > > BTW, does this mean that the new unicode emacs will have problems > rendering many charsets that are currently displayed properly by emacs? I'm sure Handa-san can confirm for sure, but unicode Emacs has a new function x_get_font_repertory which seems to deal with this situation.