From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs
Subject: Re: old bootstrap error emerges again
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:14:25 +0200
Message-ID: <ufyl5c6am.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <ebaf065f0603170835j36230a9cg@mail.gmail.com>
	<ur750vwje.fsf@gnu.org> <8764mcrmjz.fsf@emacsfans.org>
	<u1wwzwysx.fsf@gnu.org> <uhd5v67tr.fsf@comcast.net>
	<uu09vvdtb.fsf@gnu.org> <ud5gj5xzc.fsf@comcast.net>
	<u1wwzxt0k.fsf@gnu.org> <umzfns10j.fsf@comcast.net>
	<uy7z7vylg.fsf@gnu.org> <uek0yijeb.fsf@comcast.net>
	<u4q1ujlge.fsf@gnu.org> <ud5gijfop.fsf@comcast.net>
	<uveu2d3ub.fsf@gnu.org> <uk6aildtm.fsf@comcast.net>
	<ur74qctmt.fsf@gnu.org> <u4q1m8kk4.fsf@comcast.net>
	<ur74qqotl.fsf@jasonrumney.net> <upskach7z.fsf@gnu.org>
	<u64m1173i.fsf@comcast.net>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143404118 4353 80.91.229.2 (26 Mar 2006 20:15:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:15:18 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 26 22:15:14 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FNbdo-00065F-Uj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:15:13 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FNbdo-0003tq-2b
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:15:12 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FNbdK-0003sE-Hg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:14:42 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FNbdI-0003qI-67
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:14:41 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FNbdE-0003o7-QL; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:14:36 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1FNbeQ-00071P-DI; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:15:50 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-239-64.inter.net.il
	[84.228.239.64]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id DVJ79350 (AUTH halo1);
	Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:14:24 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: Dieter Deyke <deyke@comcast.net>
In-reply-to: <u64m1173i.fsf@comcast.net> (message from Dieter Deyke on Sun, 26
	Mar 2006 09:52:33 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52075 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:11471
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52075>

> From: Dieter Deyke <deyke@comcast.net>
> Cc: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org,
>    emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:52:33 -0700
> 
> All those changes did not affect the error:
> 
> In toplevel form:
> url/vc-dav.el:29:1:Error: Cannot open doc string file "c:/Users/deyke/emacs-build/work/etc/DOC"
> make[1]: *** [compile-SH] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `C:/Users/deyke/emacs-build/work/lisp'
> make: *** [bootstrap-gmake] Error 2

Okay, thanks.  I didn't expect the upgrade to change anything.

We need to understand why XSUBR (fun)->doc is zero for me, but not for
you.  Hmm...