From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: romain@orebokech.com, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu,
Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 16:15:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ufyk5ycmx.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc339e4a0604220435q7bcdda2bof775ffc47a30d00f@mail.gmail.com> (miles@gnu.org)
> Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:35:05 +0900
> From: "Miles Bader" <miles@gnu.org>
> Cc: "Luc Teirlinck" <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>, romain@orebokech.com,
> Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> On 4/22/06, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > I think we simply
> > _must_ understand why on similar systems the numbers are so different
>
> Why? What's the _downside_ of adding a fudge factor to puresize?
It makes the memory footprint larger.
> It's nice to understand every detail,
If you don't understand the problem, how do you know you indeed fixed
it? How do you know there isn't some other factor at work here?
> but sometimes it's not worth the effort.
What effort? It took me 30 seconds to run temacs under GDB to produce
the data, and another 5 minutes to write and run an Awk one-liner to
process the data into the table I posted. I wish all problems I ever
have to explore will take this little effort.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-22 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-16 7:07 PURESIZE increased (again) Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-16 7:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-16 10:56 ` Romain Francoise
2006-04-16 12:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-04-16 16:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-20 16:51 ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-20 18:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-20 21:03 ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-20 21:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-04-21 7:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-21 7:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-21 9:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-26 13:50 ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-27 20:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-27 20:52 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-28 5:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-27 21:19 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-28 5:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-28 16:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-04-28 16:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-27 21:56 ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-28 5:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-28 13:11 ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-28 15:24 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-04-28 16:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-28 17:15 ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-29 15:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-29 15:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-04-29 16:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-29 15:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-05-30 19:40 ` Reiner Steib
2006-05-30 19:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-03 11:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-09 15:33 ` Reiner Steib
2006-06-09 16:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-09 16:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-06-09 19:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-09 22:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-06-10 7:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-06-10 9:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-06-10 12:04 ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-27 22:12 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-27 22:29 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-04-27 22:53 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-27 23:16 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-04-28 14:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-04-28 16:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-28 17:25 ` Reiner Steib
2006-04-27 23:16 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-27 22:24 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-04-27 22:38 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-27 23:04 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-04-28 5:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-28 5:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-28 6:42 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-28 7:07 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-04-28 13:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-21 23:10 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-22 10:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-22 11:35 ` Miles Bader
2006-04-22 13:15 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-04-23 1:59 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-23 3:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-23 3:46 ` Nick Roberts
2006-04-23 13:51 ` Drew Adams
2006-04-23 16:02 ` Alan Shutko
2006-04-23 18:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-23 21:58 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-23 23:06 ` Nick Roberts
2006-04-23 15:54 ` Bill Wohler
2006-04-23 17:29 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-23 17:52 ` Bill Wohler
2006-04-23 17:58 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-23 19:43 ` Robert J. Chassell
2006-04-23 22:20 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-23 18:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-23 18:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-23 16:23 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2006-04-23 18:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-23 18:48 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2006-04-23 18:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-24 11:51 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-23 2:06 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-22 22:33 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-23 1:05 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-23 3:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-23 21:58 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-16 17:27 ` Romain Francoise
2006-04-16 17:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-18 17:17 ` Bill Wohler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ufyk5ycmx.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=Reiner.Steib@gmx.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=romain@orebokech.com \
--cc=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).