From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release schedule Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:08:03 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87r6qdlecf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177211302 25446 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2007 03:08:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 22 05:08:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HfSQx-0003cY-GR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:08:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfSW7-0000eq-5D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:13:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HfSW3-0000el-E7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:13:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HfSW1-0000eZ-18 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:13:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfSW0-0000eW-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:13:28 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HfSQk-0000Jb-Ql; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-254-228.inter.net.il [80.230.254.228]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id HQW29688 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:07:57 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87r6qdlecf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:25:20 -0400) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69769 Archived-At: > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Chong Yidong > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:25:20 -0400 > > We know exactly what patches went into the tree, and that they are not > risky. So I think the situation is OK. In software, you can never know such things for certain, and the more changes you make, the less certain you are in the outcome. So I think we need another pretest, but if I'm the only one, so be it.