From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50; Middle w in of permissions in dired-mode is red and bold: dired-warning Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:27:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hckt9z1u.fsf_-_@jurta.org> <878x0n1g86.fsf@jurta.org> <877ig50vta.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878x0kuagl.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205591251 555 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2008 14:27:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 15 15:27:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JaXMb-0000JK-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:27:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JaXM0-0000r7-Kw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:27:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JaXLw-0000qw-IM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JaXLu-0000qT-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JaXLu-0000qQ-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:27:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il ([84.95.2.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaXLt-00040p-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:27:14 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.216.171]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0JXS0040Y0RVIWK0@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:40:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <878x0kuagl.fsf@jurta.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92676 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:16:54 +0200 > > I think no face should be distracting. In very rare cases, a strong > color should indicate an error, so the user has to fix it immediately, > thus removing this error together with the face indication from the view. Is warning also okay to glare, or just the errors? font-lock-warning-face has been glaring for ages. > > If you really really dislike (hate?) the warning face, one thing we > > could try is to make it red and non-bold on terminals that support > > colors. If that's an acceptable compromise, then we can safely go > > ahead and make that change. > > Actually a good face to use is font-lock-comment-delimiter-face > because it is not glaring as font-lock-warning-face. As I wrote elsewhere in this thread, such a change will effectively reintroduce the problem on text terminals that Martin Rudalics was trying to fix when he made dired-warn inherit from font-lock-warning-face.