From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: FW: Emacs non-ascii characters Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:09:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132611630 21992 80.91.229.2 (21 Nov 2005 22:20:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jorussel@cisco.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 21 23:20:21 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeJzB-00007l-Pu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:18:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeJzA-0003pR-UR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EeJqw-0007dC-Oh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:09:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EeJqt-0007bd-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:09:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeJqs-0007ar-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EeJqs-0006rH-CJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-243-191.inter.net.il [84.228.243.191]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id DAG37060 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:09:25 +0200 (IST) Original-To: "Drew Adams" In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46409 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:26:16 -0800 > Cc: John Russell > > This makes me wonder if `C-\' isn't a bad binding for such a command. Should > toggling the input method be on a key binding that is easy to hit by > mistake? ``Easy to hit by mistake''? IMHO, no key combination is so _hard_ to hit by mistake as C-\. On some non-US keyboards it's almost impossible to hit by mistake, since it requires to use the AltGr key. I do use input methods a lot, and yet I have never hit that key combo by mistake until now.