From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: view-lossage hard-codes 100 keystrokes
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:35:42 +0200
Message-ID: <uek0s5gnl.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBKECBDAAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143192961 27522 80.91.229.2 (24 Mar 2006 09:36:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:36:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 24 10:36:00 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FMihz-0001WH-JL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:35:51 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FMihz-0002tt-FS
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:35:51 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FMihn-0002to-HM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:35:39 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FMihl-0002tc-PF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:35:39 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMihl-0002tZ-Mb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:35:37 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FMiiY-00059M-3l
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:36:26 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-30-202.inter.net.il
	[80.230.30.202]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id DUZ85464 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:35:34 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBKECBDAAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52027
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52027>

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:26:05 -0800
> 
> Any chance that the number of keystrokes displayed by `view-lossage',
> currently hard-coded at 100, could be made a user option?

It's not easily done, since the keys are recorded in a statically
allocated C array whose size is a compile-time constant.  I won't
recommend such a change for before the release, but that's just me.