From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building cvs emacs on a dual-core machine Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:59:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86ps9u8s2o.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167948016 3669 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2007 22:00:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 04 23:00:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H2adB-0006co-JR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:00:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2adB-00060X-2z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:00:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2ack-0005oc-Cv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:59:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2acj-0005nu-DS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:59:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2aci-0005nU-UK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:59:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H2aci-00071z-ER for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:59:44 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-66-129.inter.net.il [80.230.66.129]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FQO77974 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:59:34 +0200 (IST) Original-To: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) In-reply-to: <86ps9u8s2o.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> (merlyn@stonehenge.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64776 Archived-At: > From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) > Date: 04 Jan 2007 12:17:35 -0800 > > I just did: > cvs -q up > make clean # to start from a known base Is "make clean" indeed enough to remove everything generated by bootstrap? I think you need maintainer-clean. > time make -j3 bootstrap > > The C compiles at the beginning are much faster, although > the .el => .elc phase appears to be single threaded, but worked fine. The byte compilation runs in a single Emacs, but Make should run several other commands in parallel to byte compilation, such as autoloads, finder-data, and custom-deps. So at least the first part of byte compilation runs in parallel with another process > Oddly enough, it seems to have taken twice as long! Wow. What took twice as long, exactly? The byte compilation stage?