From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:33:28 +0200
Message-ID: <uejoa6mzr.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<jwv4pp9ttxe.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<uy7mk3d78.fsf@gnu.org> <jwvabz0sixj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<87ejocik1a.fsf@catnip.gol.com>
	<jwvps7wjux3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<buoy7mkfizt.fsf@dhapc248.dev.necel.com>
	<jwvmz30rz1n.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<85hct8ovog.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <uodnf2uf0.fsf@gnu.org>
	<85fy8riafz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <uhct72t9c.fsf@gnu.org>
	<85ps7vgsxi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <uejoa3nbb.fsf@gnu.org>
	<858xei7psc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172694846 26624 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2007 20:34:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:34:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 21:33:57 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HMVUq-0003Ry-Sy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:33:57 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMVUr-0005N8-Ha
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:33:57 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMVUP-0004yz-T6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:33:29 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMVUN-0004vl-Vk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:33:29 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMVUN-0004vb-O1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:33:27 -0500
Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1HMVUM-0002Hr-NI; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:33:26 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-14-208.inter.net.il
	[80.230.14.208]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA)
	with ESMTP id BZS18704 (AUTH halo1);
	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:33:17 +0200 (IST)
In-reply-to: <858xei7psc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:35:31 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67062
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67062>

> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:35:31 +0100
> >> 
> >> Where would have been the point in having it turned on by default if
> >> "a large majority of users" would turn it on manually, anyway?
> >
> > To lower the flood of questions posted by newbies asking why they see
> > no syntax highlight, _before_ they turn it on.
> 
> I can't remember such a flood.

It was on gnu.emacs.help, not here.