From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes to hi-lock before release. Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:13:10 +0300 Message-ID: References: <7wejmekgrd.fsf@ece.lsu.edu> <87slaux2sk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mz11lea2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177211606 25957 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2007 03:13:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bojohan+news@dd.chalmers.se, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 22 05:13:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HfSVk-0005GG-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:13:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfSaz-0002pg-72 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:18:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HfSav-0002pa-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:18:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HfSat-0002pO-S5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfSat-0002pL-Mr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HfSVd-0000sK-JQ; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:13:05 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-254-228.inter.net.il [80.230.254.228]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id HQW30736 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 22 Apr 2007 06:13:03 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87mz11lea2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:26:45 -0400) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69770 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:26:45 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, > Johan =?utf-8?Q?Bockg=C3=A5rd?= > > Richard Stallman writes: > > > ** Local Variables: > > ** mode: hi-lock > > ** End: > > ** Hi-lock: ((eval . (launch-missiles))) > > > > What is that supposed to mean? > > Are you reporting a bug? If so, would you please > > give a clear and proper report? > > Eli argued that this patch should not have been added to Emacs due to > the freeze. John Bockgard is pointing out that it is important to add > it anyway, because it has security implications. For the record, I understood the implications even before Johan pointed that out, thinking I didn't. I still think we should not have made that change.