From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:33:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <495CC210.6080900@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230906943 1988 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2009 14:35:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: dhruva Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 02 15:36:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LIl8r-0005B4-IS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:36:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47841 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LIl7c-0007Ts-Hv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:35:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LIl7Y-0007Su-69 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:35:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LIl7X-0007Sh-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:35:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58537 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LIl7X-0007Se-9i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:35:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il ([84.95.2.19]:52333) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LIl7U-0002Fa-Bl; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:35:24 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KCU00D00LMZ1200@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:36:24 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.220.202]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KCU00C5WLWN2Q10@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:36:24 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107525 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:29:59 +0530 > From: dhruva > Cc: jasonr@gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I notice process started in 2008 have the year and 00:00 > in the start time. Maybe, it is a separate issue. > Ex: > dhruva 1400 0.0 1.1 10:21 00:00 emacs.exe > dhruva 2476 0.0 0.1 10:20 00:00 cmd.exe > dhruva 2340 0.0 2.7 08:50 00:00 opera.exe > dhruva 4252 0.0 1.4 2008 00:01 procexp.exe > dhruva 2956 0.0 0.6 2008 00:00 BTSTAC~1.EXE > dhruva 1912 0.0 0.2 2008 00:00 DLG.exe If you mean the column after START, the one whose header is TIME, then that's not the start time, it's the sum of UTIME and STIME. I think these processes simply used up less than 1 sec of utime+stime combined. I see such processes as well, but others, which started in 2008, have non-zero TIME. Here's a couple of examples from my system: USER GROUP PID START TIME UTIME STIME ETIME COMMAND SYSTEM SYSTEM 392 2008 25:03 19:35 05:27 2-10:08:41 avgrsx.exe SYSTEM SYSTEM 8049 2008 01:46 00:12 01:34 2-10:09:06 services.exe SYSTEM SYSTEM 8162 2008 00:12 00:03 00:09 2-10:09:06 lsass.exe > Anyway, I will continue to explore this to the best of my abilities. Thank you.