From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Lee Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Keybinding nit Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:29:20 -0500 Organization: x Message-ID: References: <85d58p7hyu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161196249 21482 80.91.229.2 (18 Oct 2006 18:30:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 18 20:30:47 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaGBJ-0004jm-Pm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:30:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaGBJ-0007mP-Ai for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GaGB5-0007jY-GO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GaGAx-0007Oc-LE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaGAx-0007OU-Hh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GaGAx-0006u1-B4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GaGAi-0004cZ-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:29:44 +0200 Original-Received: from 66-194-80-196.static.twtelecom.net ([66.194.80.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:29:44 +0200 Original-Received: from pete.a.lee by 66-194-80-196.static.twtelecom.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:29:44 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66-194-80-196.static.twtelecom.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:d/P8av69GGYGlX2ipapKqLOTJbQ= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60897 Archived-At: >>>> David Kastrup writes: > C-x 4 0 and C-x 5 0 are not at all symmetric, and C-x 4 0 is not > really intuitive. > Maybe one should rather have C-x 4 k and C-x 5 k for killing both > buffer and window/frame? > That would be quite closer to > C-x k RET C-x 0 > and > C-x k RET C-x 5 0 I use: C-x 4 k - kill other buffer C-x 4 K - kill other buffer and delete the window C-x k - kill buffer C-x K - kill buffer and delete the window If I were to use frames, I would probably use the same scheme. I'm not sure why Emacs, in general, doesn't leverage the upper-case binding for variations on a command. It seems intuitive to me. e.g. if C-x C-s -> save-buffer why not C-x C-S -> save-some-buffers