From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Takashi Hiromatsu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest 22.1.91 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:45:26 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87ejb8vl0i.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <47C17D74.9050204@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.14.1 - "Choanoflagellata") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203907661 4167 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2008 02:47:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:47:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 03:48:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTTNu-0007lY-2P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:48:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTTNO-00057M-Dl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTTMd-0004pB-3s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:46:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTTMb-0004oa-I0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:46:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTTMb-0004oS-95 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:46:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mx55.ms.so-net.ne.jp ([202.238.83.5]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JTTMa-0002fs-LT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:46:45 -0500 Original-Received: from matsuan.so-net.ne.jp (nproxy.vdn.pwd.ne.jp [210.249.184.60]) (authenticated) by mx55.ms.so-net.ne.jp with ESMTP id m1P2kbr2007062; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:46:38 +0900 Original-Received: by matsuan.so-net.ne.jp (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:46:07 +0900 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) EMIKO/1.14.1 (Choanoflagellata) LIMIT/1.14.10 (Furuichi) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.1.91 (i386-mingw-nt5.0.2195) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90341 Archived-At: Thank you so much, I understood well. Takashi Hiromatsu At Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:13:02 +0100, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Takashi Hiromatsu > wrote: > > > For me, You meant that libxpm.dll > > has advances in stability and compatibility area. > > No. I mean that Jason builds it, so we know it is compatible with the > binary distribution (they are presumably built with the same compiler, > for example), and it works OK. But I've been using xpm4.dll until now > and I've never seen any ill effect either. > > > Ofcourse they also want to use more stable > > DLLs, but not want to download huge package. > > The barebin package also includes it and it is 4.6 MB. > > Juanma >