From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem with chinese gbk fonts on w32 Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 08:08:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5065e29005073119317520578d@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122883612 6295 80.91.229.2 (1 Aug 2005 08:06:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 08:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 01 10:06:51 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzVJd-0006Qr-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 10:06:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzVKv-0007qY-6c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 04:07:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DzUlQ-0004YQ-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 03:31:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DzUko-0004Ro-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 03:31:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzUkj-0004Hk-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 03:30:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DzUcw-0000bl-JX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 03:22:22 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7179pch001957; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 08:09:51 +0100 Original-Received: from TONKOTSU-RAMEN (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAF5DDDCC; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 08:09:50 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Sun Yijiang In-Reply-To: <5065e29005073119317520578d@mail.gmail.com> (Sun Yijiang's message of "Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:31:28 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41397 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41397 Sun Yijiang writes: > I think this change is probably not fully tested. When I use the > mule-gbk package and set font for chinese characters, they look so > wide, but when I use "emacs -q" they look nice, make no difference > with previous CVS Emacs. I roll back the src/w32bdf.c to older > version, and everything is OK. I think the change of w32bdf.c should > be reviewed, since this is really a bug. You seem to be saying that you only see the "bug" when you load mule-gbk, which is not part of Emacs. What does mule-gbk do? Does it perhaps try to work around the previous bug by doubling the width of Chinese characters?