From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "What's This?" in Describe submenu Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:36:16 +0300 Message-ID: References: <4308398B.60401@gmx.at> <200508230008.j7N081514425@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200508230440.j7N4eKJ14873@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1124826523 16073 80.91.229.2 (23 Aug 2005 19:48:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 23 21:48:34 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7ejj-0000W2-04 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:47:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7enV-0006dT-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E7ehg-000438-LC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E7ehT-0003wq-VG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:44:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7ehT-0003pN-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:44:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E7eak-0008Bc-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:37:51 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-203-14.inter.net.il [80.230.203.14]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BFW04304 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:36:16 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200508230440.j7N4eKJ14873@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:40:20 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42363 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:40:20 -0500 (CDT) > From: Luc Teirlinck > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I can only try out the KDE version and that one feels definitely > completely different from describe-key. Can you give a couple of examples, please? > While I can not try out the MS Windows version, I got three people > familiar with MS Windows vs one confirming that the MS Windows > version behaves closely to the way I described the KDE version. Those 3 people didn't respond to my IE example, so I'm not sure they disagree with me.