From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Word boundary (was: find-composition still depends on the composition property) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:32:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87tzbh7kd9.fsf@jurta.org> <87tzb5ikrw.fsf@jurta.org> <87mygusydi.fsf_-_@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225049565 1182 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2008 19:32:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 26 20:33:45 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KuBMm-00073t-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:33:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuBLg-0005hg-LW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:32:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuBLb-0005hG-Ru for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:32:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuBLa-0005g5-Qh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:32:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33779 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuBLa-0005fl-JA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il ([84.95.2.10]:56428) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuBLa-0000SA-8w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.192.143]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K9D004GH2C6GJO1@i_mtaout4.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:33:54 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105017 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > CC: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:36:05 +0900 > > In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Unless I'm missing something important, my reading of th UAX #29 > > (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-13.html) is that almost all > > scripts should _not_ have word breaks between letters and digits. And > > neither should we define a word break on script boundaries, in most > > cases. > > Although it says "Do not break between most letters. ALetter > x ALetter", ALetter doesn't include Han, Katakana, and > Hiragana. Yes, that's why I said "in most cases". > And, it also has this note: > > Normally word breaking does not require breaking between > different scripts. However, adding that capability may be > useful in combination with other extensions of word > segmentation. For example, ... So maybe we should have a user option to enable that, but I think it should be off by default.