From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:59:07 +0200
Message-ID: <uace0s2qs.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <E1EmJfO-000347-9K@fencepost.gnu.org>	<dnpptf$cqu$1@sea.gmane.org>	<dnq7l2$ue1$1@sea.gmane.org>	<dnqh85$okp$1@sea.gmane.org>	<dns53n$dk4$1@sea.gmane.org>	<dnsp6c$mg2$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<dnua00$mc2$1@sea.gmane.org>	<E1EwIlF-0002tt-00@etlken>
	<uzmm3rivy.fsf@gnu.org> <E1EweGM-0006Ms-00@etlken>
	<u7j9664ke.fsf@gnu.org> <E1EwrDF-00052p-00@etlken>
	<uwth63w1g.fsf@gnu.org> <E1Ex2Qo-0001nx-00@etlken>
	<ulkxli5fb.fsf@gnu.org> <E1ExDH8-0007J7-00@etlken>
	<ulkxkse69.fsf@gnu.org> <E1ExNRX-0006HT-00@etlken>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137166891 602 80.91.229.2 (13 Jan 2006 15:41:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:41:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: angeli@iwi.uni-sb.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 13 16:41:26 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExR2s-0005wP-4j
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:40:54 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExR37-0000oM-Ch
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:41:09 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExOe1-0002lk-Lz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:07:06 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExOd2-0002UG-0s
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:06:05 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExOYd-0001Kr-CT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:01:32 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExObc-0007gS-59
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:04:36 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-246-138.inter.net.il
	[84.228.246.138]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id CLM40571 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:59:03 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <E1ExNRX-0006HT-00@etlken> (message from Kenichi Handa on Fri, 13
	Jan 2006 20:50:07 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48990
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/48990>

> From: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
> CC: angeli@iwi.uni-sb.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:50:07 +0900
> 
> At least cpXXX can't be replaced by windows-XXX.  Do you
> suggest to use the official name ibmXXX instead?

Yes, in code-pages.el I suggest that we do that.

> But, I've just checked the name cp1252 on google and found this:
> 
> iconv supports cpXXXX from fairly long ago.  CPXXXX are used
> also in this page:
>   <http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/MICSFT/WINDOWS/>
> It seems that Java (JVM) also support the name cp1252.
> 
> So, I think the name cpXXXXs have already acquired
> citizenship, and thus it is a lack of sophistication not to
> support the name cpXXXX.

That's too bad.