From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:32:58 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <200604212310.k3LNA3Jp018780@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200604230105.k3N15Hia021791@jane.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145763198 22330 80.91.229.2 (23 Apr 2006 03:33:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 03:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: romain@orebokech.com, Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 23 05:33:15 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXVLW-0001zo-PH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 05:33:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXVLW-00087z-Aa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:33:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXVLK-00086s-SO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXVLI-00086Q-Ga for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXVLI-00086L-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FXVND-0003oc-Ce for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:34:59 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-7-235.inter.net.il [80.230.7.235]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EAJ00736 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 23 Apr 2006 06:32:56 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200604230105.k3N15Hia021791@jane.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:05:17 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53250 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:05:17 -0500 (CDT) > From: Luc Teirlinck > CC: miles@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, romain@orebokech.com, Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > After that `c' in GDB just continues, apparently completely ignoring > the breakpoint on Fload. That is very strange indeed. > After bootstrapping, my pure-bytes-used is 1200904, which is > apparently less than the 1216528 reported by Eli. This part I understand: I measured the values on MS-Windows, which loads a bunch of files other systems don't (that's why it defines a 25KB extra for PURESIZE). > Both numbers are larger than BASE_PURESIZE used to be before it got > increased from 1200000 to 1205000. After that increase I no longer > get the overflow warning. Fine, then I think we can close the issue. Thanks.