From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NEWS.22: `allows' without an object Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 22:27:39 +0300 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180466881 16898 80.91.229.12 (29 May 2007 19:28:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 29 21:27:56 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ht7MC-0004MU-7F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 21:27:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ht7MB-00052I-Oe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 15:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ht7M8-00052D-7z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 15:27:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ht7M5-000521-Se for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 15:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ht7M5-00051y-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 15:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ht7M5-0002uu-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 15:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-244-17.inter.net.il [84.228.244.17]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id HYF30182 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 29 May 2007 22:27:38 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 29 May 2007 04:48:50 -0400) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71959 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 04:48:50 -0400 > Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > In the specific case of "allow" and "enable", I know I'm not alone ;-) "Enable" is almost always wrong in such contexts, so it is better to avoid that word altogether.