From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: faq.texi
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:07:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u8xsk4259.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oe1gfbkd.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:48:34 +0200)
> From: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
> Cc: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:48:34 +0200
>
> > Well, if you oppose to the C-y binding in isearch, then I think you
> > should disqualify yourself from arguing about an identical binding for
> > S-insert, since it's clear that you will dislike them both on the same
> > grounds. I suggested the S-insert binding for consistency.
>
> There is no inconsistency in my wishes. I wish:
>
> - one key to bind to isearch-yank-line (not C-y)
> - one key to exit isearch and yank (S-insert)
Yeah, like I said: you ``consistently'' dislike both C-y and S-Ins in
this context. By contrast, what I said is if C-y does something,
S-Ins should do the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-09 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-02 4:17 faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-02 22:34 ` faq.texi Romain Francoise
2006-02-03 23:43 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-05 13:07 ` faq.texi Romain Francoise
2006-02-05 20:24 ` faq.texi Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-06 2:06 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-06 8:55 ` faq.texi Romain Francoise
2006-02-06 14:18 ` faq.texi Frank Schmitt
2006-02-07 19:20 ` faq.texi Romain Francoise
2006-02-07 20:31 ` (efaq)Inserting > at the beginning of each line (was: faq.texi) Reiner Steib
2006-02-08 22:02 ` (efaq)Inserting > at the beginning of each line Romain Francoise
2006-02-10 1:12 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-07 20:51 ` faq.texi Kevin Rodgers
2006-02-07 21:06 ` faq.texi Frank Schmitt
2006-02-08 6:36 ` faq.texi Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-08 20:38 ` faq.texi Romain Francoise
2006-02-08 21:55 ` faq.texi Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-08 22:10 ` faq.texi Romain Francoise
2006-02-09 17:31 ` faq.texi Juri Linkov
2006-02-09 20:41 ` faq.texi Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-09 21:48 ` faq.texi Juri Linkov
2006-02-09 22:07 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-02-10 0:54 ` faq.texi Juri Linkov
2006-02-10 10:58 ` faq.texi Miles Bader
2006-02-10 23:01 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-14 1:48 ` faq.texi Juri Linkov
2006-02-14 22:17 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-15 2:22 ` faq.texi Miles Bader
2006-02-15 7:14 ` faq.texi Alan Mackenzie
2006-02-15 18:49 ` faq.texi Drew Adams
2006-02-15 22:03 ` faq.texi Alan Mackenzie
2006-02-15 23:10 ` faq.texi Miles Bader
2006-02-16 0:13 ` faq.texi Drew Adams
2006-02-16 4:40 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-16 10:34 ` faq.texi Miles Bader
2006-02-17 3:20 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-17 3:44 ` faq.texi Miles Bader
2006-02-17 21:56 ` faq.texi Juri Linkov
2006-02-18 18:33 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-18 0:06 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-16 12:06 ` faq.texi Alan Mackenzie
2006-02-16 21:17 ` faq.texi Drew Adams
2006-02-17 21:54 ` faq.texi Juri Linkov
2006-02-18 3:05 ` faq.texi Drew Adams
2006-02-16 22:16 ` faq.texi Andreas Schwab
2006-02-17 21:52 ` faq.texi Juri Linkov
2006-02-18 22:41 ` faq.texi Miles Bader
2006-02-17 3:21 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-17 3:30 ` faq.texi Miles Bader
2006-02-15 16:05 ` faq.texi Robert J. Chassell
2006-02-20 0:48 ` faq.texi Juri Linkov
2006-02-20 22:05 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-10 23:02 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-11 10:44 ` faq.texi Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-12 4:31 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-09 19:04 ` faq.texi Kevin Rodgers
2006-02-09 22:14 ` faq.texi Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-10 1:12 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-08 22:05 ` faq.texi Romain Francoise
2006-02-09 17:43 ` faq.texi Juri Linkov
2006-02-25 13:05 ` faq.texi Romain Francoise
2006-02-07 20:41 ` faq.texi Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-08 19:04 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-09 7:25 ` faq.texi Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-10 1:13 ` faq.texi Richard M. Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=u8xsk4259.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=romain@orebokech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).