From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tabbed buffers Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 06:09:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <18330.23354.579245.68671@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87ejc5sf4l.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <18330.29609.396872.678539@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87wspxqwjv.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201407017 27093 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2008 04:10:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, miles@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 27 05:10:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JIyqp-00043X-Jp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:10:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIyqO-0000iH-Vm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:10:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIyqL-0000h4-GO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:10:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIyqK-0000gT-1U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:10:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIyqJ-0000gQ-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.22]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JIyqC-00059B-Tw; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:57 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-218-76.inter.net.il [83.130.218.76]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id IZE39006 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 27 Jan 2008 06:07:26 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:45:31 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87626 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:45:31 -0500 > Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org > > The main reason we have frames on ttys is to reduce the difference > between handling of ttys and handling of graphics displays. People > normally don't use multiple frames on ttys, and that is ok, people > can continue not to use them. FWIW, I do use them on a tty, for several reasons. One is to organize my work: one frame for editing code, another for Info, etc. Another reason for several frames is when I read mail: one frame is used for Rmail buffer, another for the *mail* buffer where I reply. > But getting rid of them would just mean trouble. I would certainly object.