From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Build failure under Suse 10.0 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:15:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87odrt5r9q.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17734.36719.594533.108256@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87hcxlnxdz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162332976 19989 80.91.229.2 (31 Oct 2006 22:16:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:16:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 31 23:16:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf1tw-00010B-IR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:16:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf1tv-0001EU-Tn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf1ti-0001EB-4X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:15:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf1tf-0001DT-Jy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:15:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf1tf-0001DP-9C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:15:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.73] (helo=heller.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gf1te-0003lf-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:15:51 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-196-83.inter.net.il [83.130.196.83]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id AWI04776 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 00:15:41 +0200 (IST) Original-To: "Juanma Barranquero" In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61494 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:29:52 +0100 > From: "Juanma Barranquero" > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > And, after all, we've been years waiting for the pretest. I don't > think a few days will make much difference. FWIW, I don't see any reasons to hurry with another pretest. AFAIR, we didn't yet hear from enough pretesters to have a clear idea of how many bugs are there, especially on unusual platforms.