From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Post-22.1 development? Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:54:16 +0300 Message-ID: References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <864plnorgn.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181073279 3278 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2007 19:54:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 05 21:54:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hvf6y-0001Eb-BW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:54:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvf6x-0000wd-Sf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:54:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvf6l-0000sp-IO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:54:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvf6j-0000sR-JJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:54:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hvf6j-0000sO-F3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:54:21 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hvf6h-0005jJ-Pr; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:54:20 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-6-89.inter.net.il [84.228.6.89]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id HZR14113 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:54:16 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <864plnorgn.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:17:28 +0200) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72290 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:17:28 +0200 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Richard Stallman writes: > > > FWIW, I don't think we should merge changes that are safe until > > some time has passed and we have some kind of idea about how > > buggy v22.1 is. If the number of problems we hear on > > bug-gnu-emacs is large, then we should stabilize 22.x before we > > merge changes that can potentially destabilize it. > > > > We need to see, first of all, how many problems are reported in > > 22.1. > > Why do we need to see that? Problems in 22.1 will be of two kinds: > > a) Problems that have a better fix or solution in Emacs 23 > b) Problems that have the same fix or solution in Emacs 23 In case it wasn't clear, _I_ was talking about merging changes to the EMACS_22_BASE branch, not to the trunk.