From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Steingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ChangeLog fontifications Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:08:59 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200405132050.00109.bruno@clisp.org> <200405161714.17062.bruno@clisp.org> Reply-To: sds@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084976671 18912 80.91.224.253 (19 May 2004 14:24:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 14:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Bruno Haible , rms@gnu.org, Karl Eichwalder Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed May 19 16:24:17 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQRzV-00024L-00 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:24:17 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQRzU-0000Kt-00 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 16:24:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQQsa-0006xg-FA for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 09:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQQsF-0006xB-4r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 09:12:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQQrp-0006sP-4X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 09:12:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [198.112.236.6] (helo=alphatech.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQQqj-0006em-Jx; Wed, 19 May 2004 09:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from WINSTEINGOLDLAP ([10.0.64.31]) by alphatech.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4JD8x8f004584; Wed, 19 May 2004 09:09:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Miles Bader X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "19 May 2004 10:32:18 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23708 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23708 > * Miles Bader [2004-05-19 10:32:18 +0900]: > > Anyway (as I keep saying), I've used both extensively, and the > `official' format is easier to read. could it be easier to read precisely because Emacs supports it better? -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k Good programmers treat Microsoft products as damage and route around it.