From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: faq.texi Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:14:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878xstfkz2.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87d5i23qek.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87psm0n9x9.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87lkwnkmcb.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <8764npegbm.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139526904 16210 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2006 23:15:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 23:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 10 00:14:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Kzz-0001qk-SM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:14:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7Kzz-0001OA-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:14:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7K3w-0003S8-2q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:14:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7K3s-0003QR-V9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:14:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7K3s-0003QC-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.17] (helo=gandalf.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F7K7V-0003o1-1H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:18:33 -0500 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id HVF00324; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:14:39 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-240-137.inter.net.il [84.228.240.137]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CRC40412 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:14:38 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Kevin Rodgers In-reply-to: (message from Kevin Rodgers on Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:04:22 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50281 Archived-At: > From: Kevin Rodgers > Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:04:22 -0700 > > >>Yes: C-y in isearch does not run `yank', and people expect C-y and > >>S-insert to do the same thing. > > Really? Not being a Shift-Insert user, I have no expectations. But > it sounds to me like a Windows shortcut It's not a Windows shortcut, it's a CUA shortcut, and is also supported by Motif/Lesstif and similar environments. > > I was talking about binding S-insert to do the same thing as C-y. Is > > there a problem doing that? > > I was sure you meant binding S-insert in isearch-mode-map to the same > thing as M-y (isearch-yank-kill). S-insert generally does the same as C-y, so it should be compatible in this case as well, IMO.