From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap fails on w32 Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 08:08:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <01c55f4a$Blat.v2.4$da4fab00@zahav.net.il> <20050523.152611.133277796.wl@gnu.org> <20050525.054517.90812775.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117005188 17823 80.91.229.2 (25 May 2005 07:13:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 07:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 25 09:13:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Daq44-0002Qd-G9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 09:12:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Daq7t-0006Ir-3Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:16:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Daq73-0005sS-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:15:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Daq6z-0005p2-KC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:15:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Daq6y-0005mS-J0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:15:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Daq1H-0007kI-8U; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-195-137-77-250.freedom2surf.net [195.137.77.250]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4P79Bch029333; Wed, 25 May 2005 08:09:11 +0100 Original-Received: from TONKOTSU-RAMEN (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448D4DDEB3; Wed, 25 May 2005 08:09:11 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Werner LEMBERG In-Reply-To: <20050525.054517.90812775.wl@gnu.org> (Werner LEMBERG's message of "Wed, 25 May 2005 05:45:17 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37600 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37600 Werner LEMBERG writes: > IMHO CRLFs are not part of the file contents in case of text files -- > just think of transferring it via ftp in `ascii' mode. I vote for > converting it to Unix linefeeds. Objections? Every version of diff I've encountered treats CRLF as different than plain LF. This would make it difficult to check for differences with a future version of that file/