unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Version of the Lisp Manual.
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 21:11:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <u4qc8afbk.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oeagambh.fsf@xs4all.nl> (message from Lute Kamstra on Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:40:50 +0200)

> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl>
> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:40:50 +0200
> 
> Why not let the edition of the manual equal the version of Emacs?

I think that's because not every version of Emacs automatically causes
a new edition of the manual to be printed by the FSF.  Producing a
printed manual for sale in bookstores is a costly process; I think the
FSF only does that from time to time, not when a new Emacs version is
released.

> When you see edition 2.5 of the Lisp manual, that probably doesn't
> tell you much.

It tells me that it is different from an older edition if that older
edition's number is different.  The same as when you see a book named
"The Great Foo Bar Book, second edition".

> The first thing you will do is figure out to which Emacs version
> that corresponds.

That's why the title page says:

  @titlepage
  @sp 6
  @center @titlefont{GNU Emacs Manual}
  @sp 4
  @center @value{EDITION} Edition, Updated for Emacs Version @value{EMACSVER}.

That is, the relevant Emacs version appears right next to the manual's
edition.  No need to go hunting for it.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-08 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-08 10:49 Version of the Lisp Manual Lute Kamstra
2005-06-08 14:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-08 15:40   ` Lute Kamstra
2005-06-08 18:11     ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-06-09  8:44       ` Lute Kamstra
2005-06-09 19:54         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-09 22:34           ` Lute Kamstra
2005-06-10  6:22             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-10 10:45               ` Lute Kamstra
2005-06-10 22:37                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-06-09 14:40     ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=u4qc8afbk.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).