From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A few issues with thumbs.el Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:11:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87br6zuerw.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87u0kqrsur.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87hdgon2p2.fsf@jurta.org> <87vf508myc.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87oeabsw97.fsf@rocksteady.printf.se> <87slzm26vw.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118647173 16466 80.91.229.2 (13 Jun 2005 07:19:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 13 09:19:30 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhjDy-0000n9-7r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:19:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhjIi-0005Yg-9B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhjGY-000551-6E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:21:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhjGP-00051f-6V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:21:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhjGM-0004tW-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:21:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1DhjB7-0002kK-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Dhj5C-0008CB-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:10:06 +0200 Original-Received: from user.ifsab.se ([193.41.170.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:10:06 +0200 Original-Received: from brakjoller by user.ifsab.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:10:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 6 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: user.ifsab.se User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LZz4srioLIdA71+SVlhw4ePCe/Q= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38695 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38695 Juri Linkov writes: > PNG is more optimal for small images like thumbnails. In what way? The tests I did showed that thumbnails of size 100x100 was several times larger.