From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Q on NaN
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:01:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u4qbnh3l8.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICMELACJAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:33:53 -0700
>
> (condition-case nil (setq foo (/ 0.0 0.0)) (arith-error nil))
> In older versions of Emacs (at least prior to April 2005 CVS),
> this would evaluate to nil. Now, it evaluates to -0.0NaN.
> I can modify the code like so:
> (and (condition-case nil (setq foo (/ 0.0 0.0)) (arith-error nil))
> (bar foo)) ; foo must be a number, not a NaN
> What function do I use for bar?
> `numberp' doesn't work, since (numberp -0.0NaN) is non-nil.
>
> To make the point simpler:
>
> (numberp (/0.0 0.0)) returns t. That seems like a bug to me.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. (elisp)Arithmetic Operations says:
If you divide an integer by 0, an `arith-error' error is signaled.
(*Note Errors::.) Floating point division by zero returns either
infinity or a NaN if your machine supports IEEE floating point;
otherwise, it signals an `arith-error' error.
So if the machine supports IEEE floating point (most modern machines
do), you aren't supposed to get `arith-error' in this case. Maybe
this is a bit counter-intuitive for someone who never did futz with
NaNs, but at least Emacs behaves consistently with the docs.
As for a way to test for a NaN, try this:
(= (/ 0.0 0.0) (/ 0.0 0.0))
It should evaluate to nil, since a NaN is defined to fail _any_
arithmetic comparison, even a comparison to itself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-24 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-24 19:06 Q on NaN Drew Adams
2005-06-24 19:33 ` Drew Adams
2005-06-24 19:46 ` Drew Adams
2005-06-24 21:01 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-06-24 20:26 ` Drew Adams
2005-06-24 20:56 ` Gaëtan LEURENT
2005-06-24 20:59 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-24 22:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-06-24 21:49 ` Drew Adams
2005-06-24 22:31 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-24 22:54 ` Drew Adams
2005-06-25 13:35 ` Richard M. Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=u4qbnh3l8.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).