From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: Q on minibuffer-message
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:42:57 +0200
Message-ID: <u4q3vpnam.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICAELODBAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137991401 14795 80.91.229.2 (23 Jan 2006 04:43:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:43:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 23 05:43:19 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0tXy-0001wR-CR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 05:43:18 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0taa-0004PC-VF
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:46:00 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0taK-0004Oe-Sx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:45:44 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0taJ-0004OL-9W
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:45:44 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0taJ-0004OB-4u; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:45:43 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F0tez-0003iL-3p; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:50:33 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-162-108.inter.net.il
	[84.228.162.108]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id DKL58124 (AUTH halo1);
	Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:42:57 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICAELODBAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49434 gmane.emacs.help:32788
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49434>

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:54:35 -0800
> Cc: 
> 
>     In that case, what I suggest is that you set up foo with an optional
>     argument that is provided as t when it is called interactively.  And
>     foo should only display its messages when that argument is t.
> 
> That's just what I wanted to avoid having to do. From my original message:
> 
>     I could change the definition of command `foo', to pass it a flag to not
>     call `minibuffer-message' (or to call it only when the command is called
>     interactively), but I'd rather not have to resort to that.

This doesn't explain why you wanted to avoid such a solution.