From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Folding emacsclient into emacs Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:51:55 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87sl5n5yem.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fy1nbe4f.fsf@jurta.org> <86myvu2zw1.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <87d4wodiof.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ir6gtx7w.fsf_-_@olgas.newt.com> <85bqc7hfau.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <86hclzuhyp.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189669933 11663 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2007 07:52:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 13 09:52:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVjUh-0000Bo-09 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:52:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVjUg-0006vm-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:52:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVjUb-0006tD-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVjUb-0006t1-0l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVjUa-0006sy-RU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.22]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVjUT-0007iL-3J; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:51:57 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.56.50]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id HUF73798 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:49:07 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <86hclzuhyp.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:45:18 +0200) X-Detected-Kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78743 Archived-At: > Cc: rms@gnu.org, bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: David Kastrup > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:45:18 +0200 > > Are you saying that users should be punished if the first thing they > want to do with Emacs is "merely" edit a file? No, of course not. You will see from my other message in this thread that I think the current behavior with "emacs FILE" is annoying. But making that point doesn't mean we should use preposterously wrong arguments such as that Emacs can be restarted whenever we need to edit a file, or that when there's nothing to edit there's no need to have Emacs running.