From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin,gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: is there a cygwin maintainer for gnu emacs?
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:02:09 +0300
Message-ID: <u3bpfnl66.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <BAY107-F29E79AE5E6EDDEC1D619EBF8BA0@phx.gbl>	<42F9E707.1030302@spirentcom.com> 	<ull39oevh.fsf@gnu.org> <E1E3E1X-0003e9-Kh@fencepost.gnu.org> <42FB6AF2.2060301@spirentcom.com> <E1E3b0f-0002lP-0U@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1123866334 23328 80.91.229.2 (12 Aug 2005 17:05:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:05:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jbuehler@spirentcom.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs_user@hotmail.com,         cygwin@cygwin.com
Original-X-From: cygwin-return-111693-goc-cygwin=m.gmane.org@cygwin.com Fri Aug 12 19:05:24 2005
Return-path: <cygwin-return-111693-goc-cygwin=m.gmane.org@cygwin.com>
Original-Received: from sourceware.org ([12.107.209.250])
	by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E3cvP-0002oe-FA
	for goc-cygwin@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:02:31 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 1975 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2005 17:02:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-goc-cygwin=m.gmane.org@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Original-Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Original-Received: (qmail 1967 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2005 17:02:18 -0000
Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:02:18 +0000
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-203-87.inter.net.il [80.230.203.87]) 	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) 	with ESMTP id CCI72433 (AUTH halo1); 	Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:02:06 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1E3b0f-0002lP-0U@fencepost.gnu.org> (rms@gnu.org)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.os.cygwin:67929 gmane.emacs.devel:41958
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41958

> From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
> CC: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs_user@hotmail.com,
> 	cygwin@cygwin.com
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:59:49 -0400
> 
>       As it was, without any
>     message, my initial suspicion was a SEGV or similar, which would be
>     much more likely to be a Cygwin problem than an emacs problem.
> 
> Until the bug is debugged, we know nothing about where the cause lies.

That's true, but it should have been clear that it's not a SEGV, since
Emacs says something like "Abort (core dumped)", which clearly tells
that it got SIGABRT, not SIGSEGV.

So, while Emacs doesn't say that it happened within GC, it does tell
that it committed suicide (aborted), not hit a SIGSEGV.