From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: image size limit?
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:02:19 +0200
Message-ID: <u3bmxc21w.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87oe5v7q19.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1EPjP3-0007dR-7H@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87k6giiqh3.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com>
	<E1EQ9SF-0007Ve-SF@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87hdbht7v9.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1ERYor-0008Uh-Cs@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87d5m3zu20.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129727841 7076 80.91.229.2 (19 Oct 2005 13:17:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 19 15:17:11 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ESDl9-0002Jz-Rb
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:13:36 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ESDl8-0000LB-U7
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:13:34 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ESBVQ-0003ra-Q0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:49:13 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ESBMU-0002MD-UI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:39:59 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ES9q3-0001la-Gu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:02:26 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ES9q2-0006xB-4L
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:02:22 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-161-125.inter.net.il
	[84.228.161.125]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR)
	with ESMTP id CSW24612 (AUTH halo1);
	Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:02:16 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
In-reply-to: <87d5m3zu20.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:39 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44314
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/44314>

> From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:39 -0400
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > But I don't think this limit should be absolute.  I think it should be
> > specified as a multiple of the frame height and width, and it should
> > be given as a floating point number.  I'd suggest 2.0 as the default
> > for this ratio.
> 
> What frame should we then use? The selected frame?
> 
> That's not really logical, the frame that issues the call to load an
> image (which is where we check the image size) may not be the frame
> that ends up displaying it.

How about the using display size in pixels (display-pixel-height and
display-pixel-width)?