From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Russian letters Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 06:41:25 +0300 Message-ID: References: <200607052110.21816.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <200607060043.28718.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <200607060121.26289.pogonyshev@gmx.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152157301 20522 80.91.229.2 (6 Jul 2006 03:41:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 06 05:41:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyKkD-0001yf-SI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 05:41:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyKkD-0001dZ-DY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FyKk3-0001dS-BM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FyKk1-0001dG-S4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyKk1-0001dD-No for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:41:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FyKk8-0003Ko-0z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:41:32 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-250-49.inter.net.il [83.130.250.49]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id FCU53755 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:41:23 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Paul Pogonyshev In-reply-to: <200607060121.26289.pogonyshev@gmx.net> (message from Paul Pogonyshev on Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:21:26 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56615 Archived-At: > From: Paul Pogonyshev > Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:21:26 +0300 > Cc: Andreas Schwab > > > Anyway, as documented, unify-8859-on-decoding-mode can only map to > > `iso-latin-1' and `mule-unicode-0100-24ff'. > > That's fine, but if the same characters read from file and typed from > keyboard are different in a buffer, that's nothing else than a bug. What was the file's encoding? Does it help to play with the value of utf-fragment-on-decoding?