From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: remove dabbrev--scanning-message?
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:19:52 +0300
Message-ID: <u3azfnd0n.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m28x97aedn.fsf@cs.ucsd.edu> <87bqe34isa.fsf@ambire.localdomain>
	<m24pjv9r1c.fsf@cs.ucsd.edu>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185218402 30932 80.91.229.12 (23 Jul 2007 19:20:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:20:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ttn@gnuvola.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Sean O'Rourke" <sorourke@cs.ucsd.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 23 21:20:00 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1ID3Ro-0005vo-0f
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:20:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ID3Rn-0008W4-Fn
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:19:59 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ID3Rk-0008Vm-7E
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:19:56 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ID3Rj-0008VW-QC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:19:55 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ID3Rj-0008VR-Gw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:19:55 -0400
Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1ID3Rj-0006ep-5m
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:19:55 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-246-32.inter.net.il
	[83.130.246.32]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA)
	with ESMTP id DEL97424 (AUTH halo1);
	Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:19:52 +0300 (IDT)
In-reply-to: <m24pjv9r1c.fsf@cs.ucsd.edu> (sorourke@cs.ucsd.edu)
X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75397
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/75397>

> From: "Sean O'Rourke" <sorourke@cs.ucsd.edu>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 06:40:47 -0700
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> I'm genuinely curious: For those
> people on the list with older hardware and/or many open buffers,
> with the progress messages removed, does a failed dabbrev-expand
> take more than an instant?  It didn't for me, with 80 or so
> buffers and average hardware.

What kind of hardware is ``average'' by your standards?  You might be
surprised to hear what people use to run Emacs.