follow.el typo

follow.el typo

[Davis Herring]

*** follow.el	01 Aug 2007 11:08:14 -0600	1.35
--- follow.el	12 Sep 2007 11:48:14 -0600
***************
*** 1973,1979 ****
    ;; `follow-avoid-tail-recenter'.
    ;;
    ;; By performing a redisplay on our own, Emacs need not perform
!   ;; the above described redisplay.  (However, bu performing it when
    ;; there are input available just seems to make things worse.)
    (if (and follow-avoid-tail-recenter-p
  	   (not (input-pending-p)))
--- 1973,1979 ----
    ;; `follow-avoid-tail-recenter'.
    ;;
    ;; By performing a redisplay on our own, Emacs need not perform
!   ;; the above described redisplay.  (However, by performing it when
    ;; there are input available just seems to make things worse.)
    (if (and follow-avoid-tail-recenter-p
  	   (not (input-pending-p)))

Re: follow.el typo

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Davis Herring" <herring@lanl.gov>
> 
> *** follow.el	01 Aug 2007 11:08:14 -0600	1.35
> --- follow.el	12 Sep 2007 11:48:14 -0600
> ***************
> *** 1973,1979 ****
>     ;; `follow-avoid-tail-recenter'.
>     ;;
>     ;; By performing a redisplay on our own, Emacs need not perform
> !   ;; the above described redisplay.  (However, bu performing it when
>     ;; there are input available just seems to make things worse.)
>     (if (and follow-avoid-tail-recenter-p
>   	   (not (input-pending-p)))
> --- 1973,1979 ----
>     ;; `follow-avoid-tail-recenter'.
>     ;;
>     ;; By performing a redisplay on our own, Emacs need not perform
> !   ;; the above described redisplay.  (However, by performing it when
>     ;; there are input available just seems to make things worse.)
>     (if (and follow-avoid-tail-recenter-p
>   	   (not (input-pending-p)))

Thanks, I fixed this (and quite a few other cases of misspelling and
incorrect wording in this file).