From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 74, Issue 135 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:53:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ocxpotng.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233330802 8781 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2009 15:53:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 30 16:54:35 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LSvhN-0007KM-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:54:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45814 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSvg4-0004QP-Ts for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSvfz-0004NY-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LSvfy-0004Mt-VY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51041 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LSvfy-0004Mk-Sd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il ([84.95.2.4]:37317) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LSvfy-0007vV-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KEA00800K1XQ600@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:53:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.109.18]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KEA001JDK4VVDM4@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:53:20 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108411 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:14:26 +0100 > From: Juanma Barranquero > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 13:38, Chong Yidong wrote: > > > Juanma has a patch putting pending_signals in #ifdef SYNC_INPUT, and > > I've just asked him to commit it. > > That said, I think that's ugly as hell (I've committed it so Emacs > compiles again). Thanks. > pending_signals could be defined in lisp.h outside the "#ifdef > SYNC_INPUT", which would save a lot of #ifdefs Some of the #ifdef's are in w32*.c files. Why did you need that? Isn't it known whether the Windows port uses or does not use SYNC_INPUT?