From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Greiner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem with Gnus Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:17:32 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <41782B7B.10305@gnu.org> <41792EFE.5070406@compsol.cc> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098634691 11768 80.91.229.6 (24 Oct 2004 16:18:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 24 18:18:04 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CLl4G-0007gM-00 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:18:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLlBr-00066W-EB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:25:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLlBi-00066R-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:25:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLlBh-00066E-Vg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:25:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLlBh-00066B-TH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CLl3t-0001nI-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:17:41 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CLl3s-0007BE-00 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:17:40 +0200 Original-Received: from dialup-216-12-206-181.ev1.net ([216.12.206.181]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:17:40 +0200 Original-Received: from kevin.greiner by dialup-216-12-206-181.ev1.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:17:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-216-12-206-181.ev1.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:awtKHBkuTJWJRFbZ8Gnhz6uIgq8= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28836 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28836 Reiner Steib writes: > On Sat, Oct 23 2004, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> Reiner Steib writes: >> >>> Hm, as the new agent code is in the v5-10 branch too and we intend to >>> release 5.10.7 from this branch some day, shouldn't the upgrade >>> functions be assigned to 5.10.7 *and* we should bump the version in >>> the v5-10 branch to 5.10.7 [1] now? Else people using the v5-10 >>> branch outside of CVS-Emacs won't get the proper upgrade functions >>> (though I doubt that many people use this branch). >>> >>> Lars, WDYT? >> >> Hm... why is the new agent code in 5.10? There really shouldn't be >> anything there except bug fixes, right? > > Kevin's changes in 5.10 should fix several bugs in the agent code of > 5.10.6. (I don't know the details since I don't use the agent.) > > Bye, Reiner. There has only been one truely new agent feature added to No Gnus. That feature was NOT added to the v5-10 branch. Of the code that was checked in, the only thing that was not clearly an agent bug fix was the gnus version upgrade changes. Kevin