From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: thumbs.el and transparency Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:14:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <17366.53124.274532.548329@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <878xspwnjm.fsf@jurta.org> <87slqvfobk.fsf@jurta.org> <87d5hy43b6.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0b8lwhw.fsf@jurta.org> <87bqxgynfn.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139566998 827 80.91.229.2 (10 Feb 2006 10:23:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 10 11:23:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7VQd-0003MK-8Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:23:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7VQb-0000bb-DD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7VOC-0000Mx-H6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:20:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7VO9-0000Mf-Ru for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:20:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7VO8-0000Mb-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:20:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1F7VRs-0008B7-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:24:21 -0500 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F7VNw-0002gU-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:20:16 +0100 Original-Received: from user.ifsab.se ([193.41.170.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:20:16 +0100 Original-Received: from brakjoller by user.ifsab.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:20:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: user.ifsab.se User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BAl64LyP/knj6XALqdsXwI253aY= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50320 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > I based my reasoning on an opinion expressed on this thread that > both packages should exist in Emacs. But actually I have no opinion > about this. Given the choice between a simple thumbnail package and > more advanced one, I personally would definitely select the latter. We agree then. > I think instead of adding all features of thumbs.el to tumme.el it > is more urgent to make tumme.el more usable, so it would have more > than one user ;-) Hehe :) Fair enough. I know there are at least one user more than myself... I have made some small changes the last couple of weeks and I think it is quite easy to use now. At least I don't see that it is harder to use than thumbs. I'm still waiting for someone else than me to test the latest stuff though, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of "action" in this area. :) Oh well...