From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:43:00 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <200604212310.k3LNA3Jp018780@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200604230159.k3N1xpBu021881@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <87zmicgucs.fsf@olgas.newt.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145817933 29025 80.91.229.2 (23 Apr 2006 18:45:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 23 20:45:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXja1-0003l6-Lk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:45:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXja0-00025z-Id for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjXz-000124-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjXx-000118-TG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXjXx-000112-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:43:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FXja1-0007eg-Kt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:45:09 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-236-24.inter.net.il [84.228.236.24]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EAN85010 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:42:58 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Bill Wohler In-reply-to: <87zmicgucs.fsf@olgas.newt.com> (message from Bill Wohler on Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:54:59 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53272 Archived-At: > From: Bill Wohler > Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:54:59 -0700 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Again, this is 170KB growth, certainly not a negligible amount of > > memory. > > That growth is .35% of my 48 MB Emacs process, so for what it's worth, > *I* think it's negligible ;-). It's not negligible if you have a program other than Emacs that needs to run and starts paging because it's 150KB short of its memory usage.