From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: safe_call1 considered harmful
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:00:34 +0300
Message-ID: <u1ws4d6b1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <uirlrguz3.fsf@gnu.org> <E1G3tGq-0006Z3-00@etlken>
	<uac73gdpy.fsf@gnu.org> <E1G4pMi-0005wp-00@etlken>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154170861 7854 80.91.229.2 (29 Jul 2006 11:01:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:01:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 29 13:00:59 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6mYv-0005Al-UB
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:00:54 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6mYv-0001hM-Kb
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:00:53 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6mYj-0001fY-0I
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:00:41 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G6mYh-0001eD-Ex
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:00:40 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6mYh-0001du-4o
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:00:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.73] (helo=heller.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G6mat-0002EZ-1Q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:02:55 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-215-112.inter.net.il
	[84.228.215.112]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA)
	with ESMTP id ACK74453 (AUTH halo1);
	Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:00:34 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <E1G4pMi-0005wp-00@etlken> (message from Kenichi Handa on Mon, 24
	Jul 2006 10:36:12 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57779
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/57779>

> From: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
> CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:36:12 +0900
> 
> > In any case, I think we should revert the change you made to use
> > safe_call1.
> 
> Yes.

Done.