From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unicode-2 and multitty (was: html-mode demanding a bit too tight) Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 13:39:56 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87647ooxwm.fsf@zip.com.au> <462CC030.8030203@gmail.com> <87mz0y8vyk.fsf@zip.com.au> <86vef90x54.fsf_-_@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178275216 19232 80.91.229.12 (4 May 2007 10:40:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 04 12:40:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjvCt-0002BU-EF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 12:40:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjvJV-0007Mq-SY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 06:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjvJS-0007Ml-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 06:46:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjvJP-0007Kg-Po for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 06:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjvJP-0007Kc-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 06:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjvCl-0007fp-OU; Fri, 04 May 2007 06:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-228-78.inter.net.il [80.230.228.78]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id CMW42123 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 4 May 2007 13:39:55 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <86vef90x54.fsf_-_@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Fri, 04 May 2007 11:13:27 +0200) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70539 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:13:27 +0200 > > While the release is "imminent", letting HEAD and the release branch > diverge would likely be impolite. ??? I thought the main reason for cutting the release branch was to allow development on the trunk without affecting the release. So what's impolite about committing changes on the trunk now? > Would it be better etiquette to create or use a different mailing list > than this one for discussing such work on the unicode-2 branch? Please don't start another schism.