From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: newsticker-*.el files Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:12:06 +0300 Message-ID: References: <200806082201.m58M142d000380@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213002889 2488 80.91.229.12 (9 Jun 2008 09:14:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sdl.web@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 09 11:15:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K5dTL-0001PZ-Af for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:15:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46293 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5dSX-00026P-Ij for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:14:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5dQI-0000hf-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:12:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5dQE-0000gJ-Rk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:12:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44402 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5dQE-0000g1-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:12:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il ([84.95.2.4]:19513) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K5dQ9-0003Y0-SD; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:12:10 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([80.230.28.131]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K26007TCVL55F13@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:27:07 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98786 Archived-At: > From: Miles Bader > Cc: Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:23:02 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Not that I see how this is relevant: all I'm asking is not break it > > more than it is already broken, so that the efforts to revive it won't > > be harder than they have to. The cost of this request is so low that > > I'm bewildered why I need to justify it each time. > > I think the perception is that the benefit is less than the cost, > even if the latter is "low". I submit that with a sufficiently low cost, the benefits are irrelevant.