From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rmail-toggle-header problem Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:34:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1sbpsyf9y4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235118869 19749 80.91.229.12 (20 Feb 2009 08:34:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 20 09:35:44 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LaQrI-0006CO-AH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:35:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaQpy-0005cz-4M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:34:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaQpq-0005b3-Ss for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaQpn-0005Yh-8x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47812 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaQpm-0005Yd-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:34:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il ([84.95.2.16]:34799) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LaQpi-0007ca-Ev; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:34:06 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KFC00300V36CX00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:34:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.82.14]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KFC00JHDVTMUM40@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:34:35 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109245 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:12:05 -0500 > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > So should it not yank the headers at all? Should it always yank the > "condensed" headers? Should it yank the headers as displayed (the > current behaviour)? Should it exclude "X-RMAIL"? Etc... > > I have no opinion, I'm wondering what Rmail users want. I vote for the current behavior. Wrt the "X-RMAIL" header (or any other headers added by Rmail), I don't care either way, although the pre-mbox Rmail does copy the X-Coding-System header added by Rmail.