From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs and guile (Re: ehelp woes, or why I hate a module that I
 love so much)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:51:30 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <tx1bs93obbx.fsf@raeburn.org>
References: <20020704135240.4CBB.LEKTU@terra.es>
	<ilu4rffy4nm.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<20020704164911.4CC1.LEKTU@terra.es> <tx1adorvz5m.fsf_-_@raeburn.org>
	<200207181455.g6IEtvc25102@aztec.santafe.edu>
	<tx1wursvlo9.fsf@raeburn.org>
	<200207191654.g6JGsX526997@aztec.santafe.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027101146 20960 127.0.0.1 (19 Jul 2002 17:52:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 17:52:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17VbvV-0005Rr-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 19:52:25 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Vc7z-0003BX-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:05:19 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17VbvT-0005wx-00; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:52:23 -0400
Original-Received: from 208-59-178-90.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([208.59.178.90] helo=raeburn.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Vbud-0005u6-00; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:51:31 -0400
Original-Received: from kal-el.raeburn.org ([2002:d03b:b25a:1:201:2ff:fe23:e26d])
	by raeburn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g6JHpUf07450;
	Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:51:30 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from raeburn by kal-el.raeburn.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17Vbuc-0003bC-00; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:51:30 -0400
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <200207191654.g6JGsX526997@aztec.santafe.edu> (Richard
 Stallman's message of "Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:54:33 -0600 (MDT)")
Original-Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.3.50
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5916
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5916

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> It looks like there is no standard form of argument that you can use.

Yes, neither --enable nor --with seems appropriate for an option
relevant only to the build process, and invisible to the user.  Well,
there's always 'CC="gcc -DENABLE_CHECKING"'....

> I think you should leave this out.

Okay.