From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET merge Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:31:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87fw6izq6z.fsf@gnu.org> <87obl6c7dj.fsf@engster.org> <87bogsedna.fsf_-_@engster.org> <87626vd380.fsf@engster.org> <87k3v6c9tf.fsf@engster.org> <871uhbrgob.fsf@gnu.org> <87lifjbzx3.fsf@engster.org> <87ipany8zi.fsf@gnu.org> <87626nbjbo.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349566283 7372 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2012 23:31:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 23:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Eric M. Ludlam" To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 07 01:31:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TKdqB-0004Wp-Mf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 01:31:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60036 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKdq5-0007I1-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKdq3-0007Hv-G1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:31:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKdq2-0005xo-Ib for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:31:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:50351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKdq2-0005xk-F7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKdq0-0007eX-SS; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:31:16 -0400 X-Spook: genetic InfoSec Sears Tower $400 million in gold bullion X-Ran: {dq>!W>w`E_3(IsCP-u00GR.cY@[vV9[#-4n$qVgQ].:?ojB5ejkjC]\M"U^.Mzf?Y"w%0 X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87626nbjbo.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:29:15 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154146 Archived-At: David Engster wrote: > There are still some packages which are only in CEDET upstream for > several reasons: They're either pretty new and not well tested, or are > in our 'contrib' directory and don't have proper papers, or because they > are a bit obscure (sorry Eric ;-) ) and well separated and hence would > better fit into ELPA. Is there a reason why Emacs does not have the srecode manual? http://debbugs.gnu.org9966