From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Input method or help feature needed Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:55:00 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87lj1ew6d3.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <20110218083736.GA12190@tomas> <20110220082705.GA4092@tomas> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298336119 6446 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2011 00:55:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 22 01:55:15 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PrgX4-0007w2-UE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:55:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33189 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PrgX4-0001cJ-DQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:55:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47391 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PrgWy-0001c4-Hm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:55:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrgWx-0008M4-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:55:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:34194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrgWu-0008LZ-JA; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p1M0t17C024032; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:55:01 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p1M0t1Mn029770; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:55:01 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id p1M0t0Zw028595; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:55:00 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrgWq-0003x3-LM; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:55:00 +0900 In-Reply-To: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:25:09 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-Received-From: 150.29.246.133 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136361 Archived-At: In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > > (1) list-charset-chars lists characters with code-points of > > the specified charset, list-script-chars lists > > characters with Unicode code-points. > We could show Unicode codepoints by default and charset codepoints > with "C-u". I doubt that any user would care about the latter, but > Emacs maintainers might. I believe that people who want to list characters of a specic charset prefer characters ordered by the code-points of that charset. At least, when I do M-x list-charset-chars RET japanese-jisx0208 RET, I do prefer characters ordered by JISX0208 code points. > > (2) These names are both charset and script, thus can't be > > distinguished just by names. > > lao, tibetan, ethiopic, symbol > Are the results different if you interpret these as scripts vs > charsets? Yes. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org